Skip to Content
Main content

OWEGO-APALACHIN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 827

LEVEL 1

296

36%

LEVEL 2

291

35%

LEVEL 3

182

22%

LEVEL 4

58

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 829

LEVEL 1

244

29%

LEVEL 2

304

37%

LEVEL 3

203

24%

LEVEL 4

78

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

97

24%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

85

21%

LEVEL 2

149

37%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

199

47%

LEVEL 2

141

33%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

159

37%

LEVEL 2

155

36%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

233
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

273

35%

LEVEL 2

276

35%

LEVEL 3

177

23%

LEVEL 4

56

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

269
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

222

29%

LEVEL 2

286

37%

LEVEL 3

195

25%

LEVEL 4

74

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

180

26%

LEVEL 2

267

39%

LEVEL 3

177

26%

LEVEL 4

58

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 699

LEVEL 1

144

21%

LEVEL 2

283

40%

LEVEL 3

196

28%

LEVEL 4

76

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

116

80%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

100

77%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

100

24%

LEVEL 2

148

35%

LEVEL 3

129

30%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

80

18%

LEVEL 2

159

35%

LEVEL 3

144

32%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

196

49%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

53

13%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

164

43%

LEVEL 2

145

38%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.