Skip to Content
Main content

SULLIVAN WEST CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

120

34%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

55

34%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

77

42%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

59

31%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

79

27%

LEVEL 2

97

33%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

38

86%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

29

81%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

73

44%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

60

35%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.