Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM T ROGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

147

34%

LEVEL 4

85

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

117

41%

LEVEL 4

66

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

76

37%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

59

42%

LEVEL 4

41

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

58

39%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

12

63%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

125

33%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

73

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

99

39%

LEVEL 4

58

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

146

38%

LEVEL 4

83

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

116

44%

LEVEL 4

66

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

33

69%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

14

54%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

136

34%

LEVEL 3

143

35%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

103

40%

LEVEL 4

61

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

14

48%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.