Skip to Content
Main content

BAYPORT-BLUE POINT UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

85

19%

LEVEL 2

168

37%

LEVEL 3

146

32%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

112

39%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

57

39%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

94

42%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

131

34%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

93

39%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

142

38%

LEVEL 3

145

38%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

111

44%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

47

62%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

19

48%

LEVEL 2

18

45%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

102

40%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.