Skip to Content
Main content

SAYVILLE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

68

16%

LEVEL 2

166

39%

LEVEL 3

147

34%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

122

39%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

88

43%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

67

45%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

102

46%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

56

16%

LEVEL 2

136

39%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

99

40%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

149

39%

LEVEL 3

144

38%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

117

41%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

144

38%

LEVEL 3

139

36%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

112

39%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

12

28%

LEVEL 2

22

51%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.