Skip to Content
Main content

CANDLEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

63

13%

LEVEL 2

145

31%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

106

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

91

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

60

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

55

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

84

41%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

72
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

42

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

60
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

33

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

74

40%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

24

35%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

146

35%

LEVEL 4

104

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

91

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

34

62%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

115

29%

LEVEL 3

139

35%

LEVEL 4

95

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

80

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

30

41%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

13

21%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.