Skip to Content
Main content

SELDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

93

30%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

36

37%

LEVEL 4

23

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

63

37%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

36

25%

LEVEL 2

60

42%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

18

42%

LEVEL 4

12

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

21

47%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

72

26%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

21

62%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

44

40%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

27

32%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.