Skip to Content
Main content

BATH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

152

41%

LEVEL 2

131

35%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

111

35%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

65

34%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

87

49%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

50

38%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

147

41%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

116

38%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

101

33%

LEVEL 2

124

40%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

112

44%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

51

82%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

44

76%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

56

42%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

47

37%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

119

50%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

86

46%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.