WATKINS GLEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

137

33%

LEVEL 2

157

37%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

127

29%

LEVEL 2

156

36%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

81

36%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

122

32%

LEVEL 2

145

39%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

116

30%

LEVEL 2

142

37%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

153

43%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

69

19%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

56

89%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

58

82%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

92

45%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

98

41%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.