Skip to Content
Main content

COBLESKILL-RICHMONDVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

256

45%

LEVEL 2

181

32%

LEVEL 3

101

18%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

229

36%

LEVEL 2

262

41%

LEVEL 3

118

18%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

97

37%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

90

29%

LEVEL 2

130

41%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

159

51%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

139

43%

LEVEL 2

132

40%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

237

45%

LEVEL 2

168

32%

LEVEL 3

91

17%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

209

36%

LEVEL 2

238

40%

LEVEL 3

109

19%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

195

38%

LEVEL 2

178

35%

LEVEL 3

101

20%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

189

32%

LEVEL 2

252

43%

LEVEL 3

118

20%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

61

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

40

80%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

133

46%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

163

47%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.