Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM H GOLDING MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

128

47%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

121

36%

LEVEL 2

143

43%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

45

38%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

68

45%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

83

54%

LEVEL 2

41

27%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

81

45%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

117

48%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

111

37%

LEVEL 2

127

42%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

96

41%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

98

32%

LEVEL 2

137

45%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

32

94%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

23

79%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

81

48%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

82

50%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.