Skip to Content
Main content

SCOTIA-GLENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 800

LEVEL 1

248

31%

LEVEL 2

289

36%

LEVEL 3

197

25%

LEVEL 4

66

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

178

25%

LEVEL 2

229

33%

LEVEL 3

197

28%

LEVEL 4

100

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

155

36%

LEVEL 2

164

38%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

248
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

214

29%

LEVEL 2

265

36%

LEVEL 3

184

25%

LEVEL 4

64

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

278
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

162

25%

LEVEL 2

211

32%

LEVEL 3

185

28%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

23

64%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

147

22%

LEVEL 2

269

40%

LEVEL 3

194

29%

LEVEL 4

65

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

111

18%

LEVEL 2

212

35%

LEVEL 3

192

31%

LEVEL 4

99

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

101

81%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

67

74%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

215
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

128

23%

LEVEL 2

218

39%

LEVEL 3

156

28%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

91

18%

LEVEL 2

162

32%

LEVEL 3

162

32%

LEVEL 4

85

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

120

50%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

87

43%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.