Skip to Content
Main content

BALLSTON SPA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

232

35%

LEVEL 2

195

29%

LEVEL 3

174

26%

LEVEL 4

66

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

142

25%

LEVEL 2

215

38%

LEVEL 3

134

24%

LEVEL 4

70

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

162

45%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

97

33%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

232
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

215

34%

LEVEL 2

185

29%

LEVEL 3

169

27%

LEVEL 4

63

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

128

25%

LEVEL 2

202

39%

LEVEL 3

124

24%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

155

27%

LEVEL 2

181

32%

LEVEL 3

169

30%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

87

18%

LEVEL 2

195

40%

LEVEL 3

133

27%

LEVEL 4

70

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

77

80%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

55

72%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

108

25%

LEVEL 2

135

31%

LEVEL 3

142

32%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

152

39%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

124

55%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

80

47%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.