OGDENSBURG CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

287

44%

LEVEL 2

209

32%

LEVEL 3

120

18%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

214

33%

LEVEL 2

246

38%

LEVEL 3

144

22%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

124

38%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

163

50%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

128

39%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

283

44%

LEVEL 2

205

32%

LEVEL 3

117

18%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

211

33%

LEVEL 2

240

38%

LEVEL 3

142

22%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

181

34%

LEVEL 2

199

37%

LEVEL 3

119

22%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

120

22%

LEVEL 2

226

42%

LEVEL 3

144

27%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

106

91%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

94

82%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

211

53%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

49

12%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

172

43%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

63

16%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

191
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

209

32%

LEVEL 2

244

38%

LEVEL 3

144

22%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.