JOHN F KENNEDY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

140

46%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

107

35%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

69

43%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

49

31%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

71

48%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

58

38%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

137

46%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

106

35%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

85

35%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

55

89%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

50

85%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

39

35%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

101

52%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

84

45%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.