Skip to Content
Main content

CANTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

111

26%

LEVEL 2

148

34%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

92

23%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

65

30%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

102

25%

LEVEL 2

143

35%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

88

23%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

63

17%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

117

34%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

48

70%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

47

70%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

78

44%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

63

38%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.