Skip to Content
Main content

ALGONQUIN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

118

22%

LEVEL 2

200

37%

LEVEL 3

143

27%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

99

19%

LEVEL 2

188

37%

LEVEL 3

140

28%

LEVEL 4

82

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

53

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

80

28%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

110

22%

LEVEL 2

189

37%

LEVEL 3

138

27%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

181

38%

LEVEL 3

130

27%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

183

39%

LEVEL 3

142

30%

LEVEL 4

73

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

169

38%

LEVEL 3

139

32%

LEVEL 4

82

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

50

74%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

50

71%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

78

18%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

72

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

151

36%

LEVEL 3

123

29%

LEVEL 4

79

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

40

42%

LEVEL 2

43

45%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

33

37%

LEVEL 2

37

41%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.