MARCELLUS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

131

19%

LEVEL 2

256

38%

LEVEL 3

184

27%

LEVEL 4

104

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

361
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

98

15%

LEVEL 2

193

30%

LEVEL 3

267

41%

LEVEL 4

94

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

168
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

106

35%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

186
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

121

41%

LEVEL 4

65

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

152

41%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

175
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

146

41%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

8

80%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

274
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

125

19%

LEVEL 2

248

38%

LEVEL 3

175

27%

LEVEL 4

99

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

346
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

97

15%

LEVEL 2

190

30%

LEVEL 3

254

40%

LEVEL 4

92

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

80

13%

LEVEL 2

241

40%

LEVEL 3

180

30%

LEVEL 4

103

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

353
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

69

11%

LEVEL 2

180

30%

LEVEL 3

260

43%

LEVEL 4

93

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

51

72%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

29

58%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

83

15%

LEVEL 2

215

38%

LEVEL 3

173

30%

LEVEL 4

97

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

314
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

64

12%

LEVEL 2

152

29%

LEVEL 3

226

43%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

48

45%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

34

28%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

41

34%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.