Skip to Content
Main content

C S DRIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

106

18%

LEVEL 2

220

38%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

96

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

162

30%

LEVEL 3

209

39%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

64

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

133

42%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

114

40%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

88%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

239
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

103

19%

LEVEL 2

213

38%

LEVEL 3

147

26%

LEVEL 4

92

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

287
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

74

14%

LEVEL 2

160

31%

LEVEL 3

198

38%

LEVEL 4

89

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

65

13%

LEVEL 2

205

40%

LEVEL 3

148

29%

LEVEL 4

95

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

150

30%

LEVEL 3

202

41%

LEVEL 4

90

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

41

67%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

186

38%

LEVEL 3

143

29%

LEVEL 4

90

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

264
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

179

40%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

38

44%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.