WELLWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

80

15%

LEVEL 2

158

30%

LEVEL 3

171

32%

LEVEL 4

125

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

65

13%

LEVEL 2

158

31%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

119

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

167
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

77

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

81

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

16

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

14

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

133

29%

LEVEL 3

151

33%

LEVEL 4

106

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

256
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

152

34%

LEVEL 4

104

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

10

71%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

152

31%

LEVEL 3

169

34%

LEVEL 4

125

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

145

30%

LEVEL 3

173

36%

LEVEL 4

119

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

36

82%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

282
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

134

28%

LEVEL 3

162

34%

LEVEL 4

120

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

273
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

163

36%

LEVEL 4

110

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.