Skip to Content
Main content

DONALD S RAY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

171

27%

LEVEL 2

259

41%

LEVEL 3

141

22%

LEVEL 4

65

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

126

23%

LEVEL 2

246

45%

LEVEL 3

124

23%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

130

42%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

131

46%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

108

33%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

115

44%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

149

26%

LEVEL 2

231

40%

LEVEL 3

134

23%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

104

22%

LEVEL 2

217

45%

LEVEL 3

117

24%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

14

67%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

15

52%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

105

19%

LEVEL 2

245

44%

LEVEL 3

138

25%

LEVEL 4

63

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

65

14%

LEVEL 2

234

50%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

66

78%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

61

79%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

111

22%

LEVEL 2

203

41%

LEVEL 3

125

25%

LEVEL 4

61

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

188

46%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

60

44%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

61

45%

LEVEL 2

58

43%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.