Skip to Content
Main content

JORDAN-ELBRIDGE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

207

43%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

94

20%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

131

31%

LEVEL 2

175

41%

LEVEL 3

99

23%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

98

46%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

128

54%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

90

43%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

193

43%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

92

20%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

116

29%

LEVEL 2

165

42%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

158

37%

LEVEL 2

144

34%

LEVEL 3

94

22%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

90

24%

LEVEL 2

170

45%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

49

91%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

41

89%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

116

36%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

72

26%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

91

57%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

59

40%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

119
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

128

30%

LEVEL 2

173

41%

LEVEL 3

99

24%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.