Skip to Content
Main content

WESTMORELAND CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

75

25%

LEVEL 2

125

42%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

79

26%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

59

41%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

52

32%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

73

25%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

117

43%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

21

68%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

35

85%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

65

33%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

78

41%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

33

31%

LEVEL 2

52

50%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

53

46%

LEVEL 2

35

31%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.