STARPOINT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

375
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 786

LEVEL 1

143

18%

LEVEL 2

268

34%

LEVEL 3

249

32%

LEVEL 4

126

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

391
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 760

LEVEL 1

115

15%

LEVEL 2

254

33%

LEVEL 3

246

32%

LEVEL 4

145

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

221
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

84

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

217
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

94

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

94

24%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

145

36%

LEVEL 3

123

31%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

360
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 756

LEVEL 1

137

18%

LEVEL 2

259

34%

LEVEL 3

240

32%

LEVEL 4

120

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

366
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 709

LEVEL 1

105

15%

LEVEL 2

238

34%

LEVEL 3

230

32%

LEVEL 4

136

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

366
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

81

12%

LEVEL 2

243

35%

LEVEL 3

240

35%

LEVEL 4

126

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

63

9%

LEVEL 2

235

34%

LEVEL 3

242

35%

LEVEL 4

143

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

62

65%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

52

68%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

391
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 753

LEVEL 1

110

15%

LEVEL 2

252

33%

LEVEL 3

246

33%

LEVEL 4

145

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

328
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

93

15%

LEVEL 2

215

34%

LEVEL 3

213

33%

LEVEL 4

115

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

361
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

66

10%

LEVEL 2

208

33%

LEVEL 3

225

35%

LEVEL 4

136

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

49

39%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.