Skip to Content
Main content

NEWFANE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

155

29%

LEVEL 2

209

39%

LEVEL 3

129

24%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

75

19%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

119

30%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

59

24%

LEVEL 2

93

37%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

96

33%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

141

28%

LEVEL 2

200

40%

LEVEL 3

123

24%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

109

29%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

101

22%

LEVEL 2

193

42%

LEVEL 3

125

27%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

132

38%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

54

73%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

26

55%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

136

43%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

88

40%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.