NEWFANE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

122

32%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

112

45%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

53

45%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

77

37%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

35

27%

LEVEL 2

59

45%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

112

31%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

109

46%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

137

41%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

103

47%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

40

75%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

102

44%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

65

43%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

67

44%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

47

48%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.