Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #31 - STATEN ISLAND GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,674
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,102

LEVEL 1

6,917

26%

LEVEL 2

9,511

36%

LEVEL 3

6,634

25%

LEVEL 4

3,040

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,385
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,002

LEVEL 1

5,713

22%

LEVEL 2

8,904

34%

LEVEL 3

7,624

29%

LEVEL 4

3,761

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,489
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,719

LEVEL 1

2,586

20%

LEVEL 2

4,644

37%

LEVEL 3

3,660

29%

LEVEL 4

1,829

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,421
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,607

LEVEL 1

2,050

16%

LEVEL 2

4,136

33%

LEVEL 3

4,104

33%

LEVEL 4

2,317

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,185
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,383

LEVEL 1

4,331

32%

LEVEL 2

4,867

36%

LEVEL 3

2,974

22%

LEVEL 4

1,211

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,964
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,395

LEVEL 1

3,663

27%

LEVEL 2

4,768

36%

LEVEL 3

3,520

26%

LEVEL 4

1,444

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

67
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

85

43%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

117
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

38
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

45
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

42

38%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,207
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,077

LEVEL 1

238

11%

LEVEL 2

632

30%

LEVEL 3

735

35%

LEVEL 4

472

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,359
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,094

LEVEL 1

183

9%

LEVEL 2

552

26%

LEVEL 3

796

38%

LEVEL 4

563

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,239
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,521

LEVEL 1

2,463

18%

LEVEL 2

4,819

36%

LEVEL 3

4,165

31%

LEVEL 4

2,074

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,974
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,066

LEVEL 1

1,836

14%

LEVEL 2

4,256

33%

LEVEL 3

4,509

35%

LEVEL 4

2,465

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

580
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,344

LEVEL 1

1,534

46%

LEVEL 2

1,230

37%

LEVEL 3

464

14%

LEVEL 4

116

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

775
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,364

LEVEL 1

1,351

40%

LEVEL 2

1,238

37%

LEVEL 3

587

17%

LEVEL 4

188

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,543
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,862

LEVEL 1

2,610

38%

LEVEL 2

2,709

39%

LEVEL 3

1,205

18%

LEVEL 4

338

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,115
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,104

LEVEL 1

2,259

32%

LEVEL 2

2,730

38%

LEVEL 3

1,626

23%

LEVEL 4

489

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,044
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,056

LEVEL 1

2,741

14%

LEVEL 2

7,271

38%

LEVEL 3

6,110

32%

LEVEL 4

2,934

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,541
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,925

LEVEL 1

1,950

10%

LEVEL 2

6,434

34%

LEVEL 3

6,895

36%

LEVEL 4

3,646

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

630
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,046

LEVEL 1

4,176

59%

LEVEL 2

2,240

32%

LEVEL 3

524

7%

LEVEL 4

106

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

844
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,077

LEVEL 1

3,763

53%

LEVEL 2

2,470

35%

LEVEL 3

729

10%

LEVEL 4

115

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9,633
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,870

LEVEL 1

6,043

24%

LEVEL 2

9,194

37%

LEVEL 3

6,597

27%

LEVEL 4

3,036

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11,343
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,794

LEVEL 1

4,879

20%

LEVEL 2

8,572

35%

LEVEL 3

7,584

31%

LEVEL 4

3,759

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

41
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,232

LEVEL 1

874

71%

LEVEL 2

317

26%

LEVEL 3

37

3%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,208

LEVEL 1

834

69%

LEVEL 2

332

27%

LEVEL 3

40

3%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,760
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,330

LEVEL 1

1,750

15%

LEVEL 2

3,820

34%

LEVEL 3

3,716

33%

LEVEL 4

2,044

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,621
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,346

LEVEL 1

1,366

12%

LEVEL 2

3,359

30%

LEVEL 3

4,132

36%

LEVEL 4

2,489

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,914
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,772

LEVEL 1

5,167

35%

LEVEL 2

5,691

39%

LEVEL 3

2,918

20%

LEVEL 4

996

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,764
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,656

LEVEL 1

4,347

30%

LEVEL 2

5,545

38%

LEVEL 3

3,492

24%

LEVEL 4

1,272

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.