Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #28 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,208
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,873

LEVEL 1

4,367

29%

LEVEL 2

5,298

36%

LEVEL 3

3,515

24%

LEVEL 4

1,693

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,328
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,878

LEVEL 1

3,458

23%

LEVEL 2

5,092

34%

LEVEL 3

4,039

27%

LEVEL 4

2,289

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,904
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,207

LEVEL 1

1,688

23%

LEVEL 2

2,615

36%

LEVEL 3

1,937

27%

LEVEL 4

967

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,535
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,207

LEVEL 1

1,254

17%

LEVEL 2

2,418

34%

LEVEL 3

2,173

30%

LEVEL 4

1,362

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,304
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,666

LEVEL 1

2,679

35%

LEVEL 2

2,683

35%

LEVEL 3

1,578

21%

LEVEL 4

726

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,793
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,671

LEVEL 1

2,204

29%

LEVEL 2

2,674

35%

LEVEL 3

1,866

24%

LEVEL 4

927

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

102
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

46

27%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

126
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

65

33%

LEVEL 4

61

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

196
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

147

27%

LEVEL 2

208

38%

LEVEL 3

134

24%

LEVEL 4

62

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

232
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

114

21%

LEVEL 2

204

37%

LEVEL 3

168

31%

LEVEL 4

64

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,036
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,025

LEVEL 1

677

17%

LEVEL 2

1,312

33%

LEVEL 3

1,271

32%

LEVEL 4

765

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,432
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,167

LEVEL 1

550

13%

LEVEL 2

1,185

28%

LEVEL 3

1,396

34%

LEVEL 4

1,036

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,062
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,430

LEVEL 1

563

23%

LEVEL 2

805

33%

LEVEL 3

663

27%

LEVEL 4

399

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,243
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,425

LEVEL 1

438

18%

LEVEL 2

744

31%

LEVEL 3

708

29%

LEVEL 4

535

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

811
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,856

LEVEL 1

1,602

42%

LEVEL 2

1,443

37%

LEVEL 3

630

16%

LEVEL 4

181

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,025
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,655

LEVEL 1

1,229

34%

LEVEL 2

1,401

38%

LEVEL 3

770

21%

LEVEL 4

255

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,001
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,838

LEVEL 1

1,352

35%

LEVEL 2

1,485

39%

LEVEL 3

761

20%

LEVEL 4

240

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,270
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,881

LEVEL 1

1,100

28%

LEVEL 2

1,511

39%

LEVEL 3

932

24%

LEVEL 4

338

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,015
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,081

LEVEL 1

2,542

21%

LEVEL 2

4,524

37%

LEVEL 3

3,360

28%

LEVEL 4

1,655

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,066
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,100

LEVEL 1

1,823

15%

LEVEL 2

4,211

35%

LEVEL 3

3,820

32%

LEVEL 4

2,246

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

193
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,792

LEVEL 1

1,825

65%

LEVEL 2

774

28%

LEVEL 3

155

6%

LEVEL 4

38

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

262
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,778

LEVEL 1

1,635

59%

LEVEL 2

881

32%

LEVEL 3

219

8%

LEVEL 4

43

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,150
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,528

LEVEL 1

3,401

25%

LEVEL 2

4,977

37%

LEVEL 3

3,463

26%

LEVEL 4

1,687

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,268
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,562

LEVEL 1

2,561

19%

LEVEL 2

4,733

35%

LEVEL 3

3,984

29%

LEVEL 4

2,284

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,345

LEVEL 1

966

72%

LEVEL 2

321

24%

LEVEL 3

52

4%

LEVEL 4

6

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,316

LEVEL 1

897

68%

LEVEL 2

359

27%

LEVEL 3

55

4%

LEVEL 4

5

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,373
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,903

LEVEL 1

977

20%

LEVEL 2

1,553

32%

LEVEL 3

1,457

30%

LEVEL 4

916

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,873
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,250

LEVEL 1

854

16%

LEVEL 2

1,523

29%

LEVEL 3

1,589

30%

LEVEL 4

1,284

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,835
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,970

LEVEL 1

3,390

34%

LEVEL 2

3,745

38%

LEVEL 3

2,058

21%

LEVEL 4

777

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,455
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,628

LEVEL 1

2,604

27%

LEVEL 2

3,569

37%

LEVEL 3

2,450

25%

LEVEL 4

1,005

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.