Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #27 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,342
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,297

LEVEL 1

6,886

32%

LEVEL 2

8,069

38%

LEVEL 3

4,573

21%

LEVEL 4

1,769

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,983
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,387

LEVEL 1

5,355

25%

LEVEL 2

8,049

38%

LEVEL 3

5,499

26%

LEVEL 4

2,484

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,691
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,381

LEVEL 1

2,748

26%

LEVEL 2

3,942

38%

LEVEL 3

2,609

25%

LEVEL 4

1,082

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,574
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,375

LEVEL 1

2,030

20%

LEVEL 2

3,771

36%

LEVEL 3

3,044

29%

LEVEL 4

1,530

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,651
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,916

LEVEL 1

4,138

38%

LEVEL 2

4,127

38%

LEVEL 3

1,964

18%

LEVEL 4

687

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,409
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,012

LEVEL 1

3,325

30%

LEVEL 2

4,278

39%

LEVEL 3

2,455

22%

LEVEL 4

954

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

45
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

35

40%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

190
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 706

LEVEL 1

226

32%

LEVEL 2

290

41%

LEVEL 3

144

20%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

265
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 794

LEVEL 1

207

26%

LEVEL 2

322

41%

LEVEL 3

181

23%

LEVEL 4

84

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,185
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,200

LEVEL 1

1,042

20%

LEVEL 2

1,973

38%

LEVEL 3

1,479

28%

LEVEL 4

706

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,644
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,195

LEVEL 1

775

15%

LEVEL 2

1,776

34%

LEVEL 3

1,662

32%

LEVEL 4

982

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,109
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,344

LEVEL 1

465

20%

LEVEL 2

770

33%

LEVEL 3

736

31%

LEVEL 4

373

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,250
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,327

LEVEL 1

385

17%

LEVEL 2

692

30%

LEVEL 3

746

32%

LEVEL 4

504

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

942
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,335

LEVEL 1

2,411

45%

LEVEL 2

1,982

37%

LEVEL 3

736

14%

LEVEL 4

206

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,301
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,222

LEVEL 1

1,818

35%

LEVEL 2

2,103

40%

LEVEL 3

1,004

19%

LEVEL 4

297

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,889
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,640

LEVEL 1

2,719

36%

LEVEL 2

3,032

40%

LEVEL 3

1,459

19%

LEVEL 4

430

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,478
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,762

LEVEL 1

2,154

28%

LEVEL 2

3,130

40%

LEVEL 3

1,871

24%

LEVEL 4

607

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,055
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,991

LEVEL 1

4,057

24%

LEVEL 2

6,879

40%

LEVEL 3

4,322

25%

LEVEL 4

1,733

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,580
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,961

LEVEL 1

2,708

16%

LEVEL 2

6,673

39%

LEVEL 3

5,153

30%

LEVEL 4

2,427

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

287
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,306

LEVEL 1

2,829

66%

LEVEL 2

1,190

28%

LEVEL 3

251

6%

LEVEL 4

36

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

403
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,426

LEVEL 1

2,647

60%

LEVEL 2

1,376

31%

LEVEL 3

346

8%

LEVEL 4

57

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,293
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,885

LEVEL 1

5,821

29%

LEVEL 2

7,771

39%

LEVEL 3

4,529

23%

LEVEL 4

1,764

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,934
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,983

LEVEL 1

4,367

22%

LEVEL 2

7,682

38%

LEVEL 3

5,453

27%

LEVEL 4

2,481

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,412

LEVEL 1

1,065

75%

LEVEL 2

298

21%

LEVEL 3

44

3%

LEVEL 4

5

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,404

LEVEL 1

988

70%

LEVEL 2

367

26%

LEVEL 3

46

3%

LEVEL 4

3

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,018
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,018

LEVEL 1

1,253

25%

LEVEL 2

1,747

35%

LEVEL 3

1,345

27%

LEVEL 4

673

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,433
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,092

LEVEL 1

986

19%

LEVEL 2

1,673

33%

LEVEL 3

1,508

30%

LEVEL 4

925

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,324
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,279

LEVEL 1

5,633

35%

LEVEL 2

6,322

39%

LEVEL 3

3,228

20%

LEVEL 4

1,096

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,550
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,295

LEVEL 1

4,369

27%

LEVEL 2

6,376

39%

LEVEL 3

3,991

24%

LEVEL 4

1,559

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.