Skip to Content
Main content

JAMES J AMBROSE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

98

38%

LEVEL 4

82

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

105

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

52

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

57

37%

LEVEL 4

66

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

55

43%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

139
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

32

17%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

69

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

152
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

79

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

14

54%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

9

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

82

36%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

105

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

212
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

105

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

56

39%

LEVEL 4

60

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

71

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

34

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.