Skip to Content
Main content

PS 197 KINGS HIGHWAY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

33

26%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

41

33%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

43

37%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

13

32%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

29

52%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

40

63%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

28

68%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

33

66%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

22

21%

LEVEL 2

43

40%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

37

33%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

52

36%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

49

36%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.