Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #22 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,215
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,821

LEVEL 1

4,210

28%

LEVEL 2

5,396

36%

LEVEL 3

3,591

24%

LEVEL 4

1,624

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,367
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,659

LEVEL 1

3,230

22%

LEVEL 2

5,062

35%

LEVEL 3

4,240

29%

LEVEL 4

2,127

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,928
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,176

LEVEL 1

1,643

23%

LEVEL 2

2,605

36%

LEVEL 3

1,971

27%

LEVEL 4

957

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,563
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,132

LEVEL 1

1,199

17%

LEVEL 2

2,370

33%

LEVEL 3

2,258

32%

LEVEL 4

1,305

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,287
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,645

LEVEL 1

2,567

34%

LEVEL 2

2,791

37%

LEVEL 3

1,620

21%

LEVEL 4

667

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,804
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,527

LEVEL 1

2,031

27%

LEVEL 2

2,692

36%

LEVEL 3

1,982

26%

LEVEL 4

822

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

37
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

20

26%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

17

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

64
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

30
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

23

26%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

47
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

30

30%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,215
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,366

LEVEL 1

439

19%

LEVEL 2

712

30%

LEVEL 3

753

32%

LEVEL 4

462

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,322
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,420

LEVEL 1

372

15%

LEVEL 2

726

30%

LEVEL 3

801

33%

LEVEL 4

521

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,975
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,058

LEVEL 1

722

18%

LEVEL 2

1,361

34%

LEVEL 3

1,282

32%

LEVEL 4

693

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,342
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,096

LEVEL 1

591

14%

LEVEL 2

1,163

28%

LEVEL 3

1,434

35%

LEVEL 4

908

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,409
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,074

LEVEL 1

2,265

37%

LEVEL 2

2,400

40%

LEVEL 3

1,082

18%

LEVEL 4

327

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,873
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,740

LEVEL 1

1,611

28%

LEVEL 2

2,256

39%

LEVEL 3

1,390

24%

LEVEL 4

483

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

549
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,156

LEVEL 1

741

34%

LEVEL 2

866

40%

LEVEL 3

430

20%

LEVEL 4

119

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

719
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,188

LEVEL 1

617

28%

LEVEL 2

852

39%

LEVEL 3

547

25%

LEVEL 4

172

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,948
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,720

LEVEL 1

2,301

20%

LEVEL 2

4,471

38%

LEVEL 3

3,383

29%

LEVEL 4

1,565

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,992
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,534

LEVEL 1

1,506

13%

LEVEL 2

4,036

35%

LEVEL 3

3,936

34%

LEVEL 4

2,056

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

267
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,101

LEVEL 1

1,909

62%

LEVEL 2

925

30%

LEVEL 3

208

7%

LEVEL 4

59

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

375
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,125

LEVEL 1

1,724

55%

LEVEL 2

1,026

33%

LEVEL 3

304

10%

LEVEL 4

71

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,148
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,575

LEVEL 1

3,362

25%

LEVEL 2

5,065

37%

LEVEL 3

3,528

26%

LEVEL 4

1,620

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,321
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,507

LEVEL 1

2,443

18%

LEVEL 2

4,743

35%

LEVEL 3

4,195

31%

LEVEL 4

2,126

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,246

LEVEL 1

848

68%

LEVEL 2

331

27%

LEVEL 3

63

5%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,152

LEVEL 1

787

68%

LEVEL 2

319

28%

LEVEL 3

45

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,179
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,713

LEVEL 1

910

19%

LEVEL 2

1,624

34%

LEVEL 3

1,374

29%

LEVEL 4

805

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,597
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,617

LEVEL 1

664

14%

LEVEL 2

1,356

29%

LEVEL 3

1,587

34%

LEVEL 4

1,010

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,036
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,108

LEVEL 1

3,300

33%

LEVEL 2

3,772

37%

LEVEL 3

2,217

22%

LEVEL 4

819

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,770
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,042

LEVEL 1

2,566

26%

LEVEL 2

3,706

37%

LEVEL 3

2,653

26%

LEVEL 4

1,117

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.