Skip to Content
Main content

PS 58 CARROLL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

156

41%

LEVEL 4

108

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

142

41%

LEVEL 4

130

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

64

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

77

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

79

42%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

81

45%

LEVEL 4

53

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

28
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

17

59%

LEVEL 4

11

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

31
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

17

49%

LEVEL 4

14

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

9

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

110

42%

LEVEL 4

75

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

34

14%

LEVEL 3

96

41%

LEVEL 4

98

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

13

26%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

18

43%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

144

44%

LEVEL 4

106

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

37

12%

LEVEL 3

133

44%

LEVEL 4

126

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

17

32%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

12

25%

LEVEL 2

23

48%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

260
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

152

41%

LEVEL 4

108

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

270
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

55

16%

LEVEL 3

140

42%

LEVEL 4

130

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

148

43%

LEVEL 4

103

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

259
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

132

42%

LEVEL 4

127

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.