Skip to Content
Main content

PS 211 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

168

51%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

148

46%

LEVEL 2

116

36%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

74

42%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

62

38%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

94

60%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

86

54%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

149

51%

LEVEL 2

97

33%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

129

46%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

123

45%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

106

40%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

45

80%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

42

75%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

91

38%

LEVEL 2

103

43%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

77

81%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

71

80%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

162

51%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

142

46%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.