Skip to Content
Main content

PS 109 SEDGWICK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

203

54%

LEVEL 2

128

34%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

143

41%

LEVEL 2

134

38%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

93

50%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

60

35%

LEVEL 2

73

42%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

110

57%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

83

46%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

48

56%

LEVEL 2

29

34%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

151

53%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

114

42%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

125

44%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

111

44%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

78

83%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

68

71%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

138

47%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

91

33%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

65

77%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

52

67%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

196

56%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

132

40%

LEVEL 2

126

39%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.