Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 22 JORDAN L MOTT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

277

65%

LEVEL 2

127

30%

LEVEL 3

18

4%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

185

50%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

28

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

130

62%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

72

43%

LEVEL 2

78

46%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

147

69%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

113

57%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

68

60%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

42

46%

LEVEL 2

39

43%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

204

68%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

11

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

142

53%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

199

59%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

18

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

130

44%

LEVEL 2

130

44%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

78

92%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

55

74%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

149

55%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

18

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

118

52%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

128

84%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

108

77%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

272

66%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

17

4%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

176

50%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

26

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.