THURGOOD MARSHALL ACAD FOR LEARNING GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

78

50%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

29

32%

LEVEL 2

41

46%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

39

48%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

29

42%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

22

29%

LEVEL 2

39

52%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

43

37%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

57

50%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

20

51%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

73

53%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

74

49%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

16

53%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

21

58%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

53

41%

LEVEL 2

46

36%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

33

27%

LEVEL 2

57

47%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.