Skip to Content
Main content

LEXINGTON ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

108

40%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

98

30%

LEVEL 2

153

47%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

48

34%

LEVEL 2

63

45%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

77

49%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

60

47%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

59

35%

LEVEL 2

76

44%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

18

56%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

95

41%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

86

30%

LEVEL 2

132

47%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

99

47%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

129

50%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

42

69%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

43

61%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

83

35%

LEVEL 2

107

45%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

77

26%

LEVEL 2

142

48%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

25

76%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

21

64%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

105

41%

LEVEL 2

110

43%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

88

29%

LEVEL 2

143

47%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.