Skip to Content
Main content

BERNER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

68

16%

LEVEL 2

152

35%

LEVEL 3

175

40%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

127

38%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

89

45%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

72

43%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

86

36%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

55

34%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

143

35%

LEVEL 3

162

40%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

117

39%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

9

56%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

144

36%

LEVEL 3

173

44%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

127

40%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

28

74%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

163

40%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

117

39%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

12

40%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.