JOHN F KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

127

33%

LEVEL 4

95

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

97

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

48

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

55

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

47

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

42

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

23

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

24

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

60

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

127

36%

LEVEL 4

95

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

97

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

18

53%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

89

28%

LEVEL 3

117

37%

LEVEL 4

82

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

82

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

15

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.