H B THOMPSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

142

30%

LEVEL 3

185

39%

LEVEL 4

117

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

137

37%

LEVEL 4

99

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

61

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

69

39%

LEVEL 4

49

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

106

40%

LEVEL 4

56

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

68

35%

LEVEL 4

50

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

155
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

82

40%

LEVEL 4

73

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

138
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

75

39%

LEVEL 4

63

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

90

38%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

121

28%

LEVEL 3

181

42%

LEVEL 4

116

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

130

38%

LEVEL 4

98

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

18

41%

LEVEL 2

21

48%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

284
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

174

40%

LEVEL 4

110

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

220
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

93

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.