Skip to Content
Main content

HARBOR HILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

96

41%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

88

42%

LEVEL 4

54

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

43

37%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

44

42%

LEVEL 4

30

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

53

45%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

44

41%

LEVEL 4

24

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

14

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

15

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

76

42%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

69

43%

LEVEL 4

37

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

92

42%

LEVEL 4

53

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

85

44%

LEVEL 4

53

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

95

41%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

88

40%

LEVEL 4

52

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

83

42%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.