Skip to Content
Main content

A D OLIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

184

41%

LEVEL 3

109

24%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

77

18%

LEVEL 2

156

36%

LEVEL 3

129

30%

LEVEL 4

70

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

92

42%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

87

25%

LEVEL 2

149

42%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

54

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

177

44%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

125

32%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

37

80%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

33

72%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

93

35%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

47

28%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.