ATTICA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

184

34%

LEVEL 2

200

37%

LEVEL 3

120

22%

LEVEL 4

37

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

137

27%

LEVEL 2

192

38%

LEVEL 3

130

26%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

112

41%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

85

37%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

170

33%

LEVEL 2

194

38%

LEVEL 3

114

22%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

127

27%

LEVEL 2

185

39%

LEVEL 3

124

26%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

123

26%

LEVEL 2

190

41%

LEVEL 3

117

25%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

74

17%

LEVEL 2

183

43%

LEVEL 3

127

30%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

61

82%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

63

83%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

78

24%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

124

40%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

106

50%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

83

44%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.