Skip to Content
Main content

CHITTENANGO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

190

28%

LEVEL 2

235

35%

LEVEL 3

175

26%

LEVEL 4

76

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

163

23%

LEVEL 2

251

36%

LEVEL 3

196

28%

LEVEL 4

94

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

64

18%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

114

34%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

239
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

181

29%

LEVEL 2

214

34%

LEVEL 3

168

26%

LEVEL 4

71

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

277
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

154

23%

LEVEL 2

231

35%

LEVEL 3

188

28%

LEVEL 4

89

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

120

20%

LEVEL 2

220

37%

LEVEL 3

171

29%

LEVEL 4

76

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

88

14%

LEVEL 2

237

39%

LEVEL 3

193

32%

LEVEL 4

92

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

70

79%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

75

80%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

159

36%

LEVEL 3

133

30%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

221
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

150

35%

LEVEL 3

143

33%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

106

45%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

100

37%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.