Skip to Content
Main content

CANASTOTA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

135

49%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

104

40%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

54

45%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

40

31%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

81

53%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

64

49%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

120

47%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

95

41%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

58

28%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

40

95%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

46

90%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

39

32%

LEVEL 2

47

38%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

32

31%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

96

64%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

72

47%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.