GENERAL BROWN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

231

37%

LEVEL 2

239

39%

LEVEL 3

115

19%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

140

23%

LEVEL 2

265

43%

LEVEL 3

163

27%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

74

26%

LEVEL 2

127

44%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

128

44%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

157

48%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

137

43%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

214

37%

LEVEL 2

221

39%

LEVEL 3

107

19%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

133

23%

LEVEL 2

250

43%

LEVEL 3

151

26%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

129

27%

LEVEL 2

216

44%

LEVEL 3

110

23%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

238

47%

LEVEL 3

155

31%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

102

78%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

73

67%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

96

26%

LEVEL 2

156

43%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

152

43%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

135

54%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

113

44%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.