GREENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

96

36%

LEVEL 2

107

40%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

34

32%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

39

30%

LEVEL 2

52

40%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

47

50%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

57

42%

LEVEL 2

55

41%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

76

41%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

87

35%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

53

31%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

102

46%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

28

90%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

39

87%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

45

34%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

72

44%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

36

51%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

55

53%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.