SALMON RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

267

52%

LEVEL 2

167

33%

LEVEL 3

66

13%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

268

49%

LEVEL 2

196

36%

LEVEL 3

67

12%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

104

44%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

101

40%

LEVEL 2

104

41%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

163

59%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

167

58%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

40
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

171

53%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

44
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

173

51%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

94

51%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

89

46%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

195

45%

LEVEL 2

161

37%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

205

43%

LEVEL 2

188

40%

LEVEL 3

65

14%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

72

91%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

63

86%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

35

30%

LEVEL 2

48

42%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

247

58%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

233

54%

LEVEL 2

148

34%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

78
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

254

51%

LEVEL 2

166

33%

LEVEL 3

66

13%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

81
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

253

48%

LEVEL 2

195

37%

LEVEL 3

67

13%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

13

93%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

15

94%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.