AKRON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

123

28%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

123

28%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

93

22%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

65

31%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

37

62%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

31

56%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

112

31%

LEVEL 3

126

35%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

82

21%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

122

31%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

63

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

41

87%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

36

77%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

74

44%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

60

37%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.